Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts

From: Jim Miller WB5OXQ (wb5oxq@grandecom.net)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 22:02:49 EDT

Next message: scsilverdak: "TEST"
Previous message: Jim Miller WB5OXQ: "Re: Subject: Trading for a 2003 Ram 5.7 hemi maybe"
In reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Next in thread: andy levy: "Re: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Reply: andy levy: "Re: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

If I cannot get a 3.92 anti spin but have to take a 3.55 anti spin how hard
is that to change and can the computer be reprogrammed to compensate if I
did?
----- Original Message -----
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts

Next message: scsilverdak: "TEST"
Previous message: Jim Miller WB5OXQ: "Re: Subject: Trading for a 2003 Ram 5.7 hemi maybe"
In reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Next in thread: andy levy: "Re: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Reply: andy levy: "Re: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: RE: RE: Ram Hemi Performance parts"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:27 EST