William Hall <abeercan@yahoo.com> wrote:
:> The replacement most often mentioned is a CO2
:> system having an advantage of no net increase in
:> global warming gases. Another alternative
:> refrigerant being considered in Europe is
:> HFC-152, which is less harmful to the ozone
:> layer but is somewhat flammable, having a lower
:> global warming affect as compared with HFC-134a.
: Well, wouldn't that be nice? The HFC-152 is only
: "somewhat flammable"? Imagine getting in a wreck and
: busting a hole in the condenser, then a small spark.
: Hmmm, for some reason this seems like a bad idea to
: me.
Oh c'mon, surely that's a small price to pay! So what if millions
people who should be riding bicycles anyway instead of driving gas
guzzling vehicles get burned to a crisp - that's worth it to justify
some junk science and "protect" something which we know nothing about
in the first place isn't it? ;-)
---Jon-
.---- Jon Steiger ------ jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com ------. | I'm the: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA. Rec & UL Pilot - SEL | | 70 Cuda, 90 Dak 'vert, 92 Ram 4x4, 96 Dak, 96 Intruder 1400, 96 FireFly | `------------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com ----'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:28 EST