Re: Re: Re: Possible Group Buy

From: greg conner (dodgeboy93@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 16:35:15 EDT


Chrysler did away with the EGR valve on magnum motors after the 95 model
year along with the change from obdI to obdII

Greg Conner
1996 RC
3.9 hybrid

>From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Possible Group Buy
>Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:28:46 -0500
>
>All this talk about egr and non-egr has be a little confused... Shouldn't
>everyone's trucks have an egr? I thought this piece of equipment was
>required to pass emissions..... Can someone set me straight?
>
>--
>- Josh
>Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
>""greg conner"" <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:Law12-F46WD661HU8df0005d711@hotmail.com...
> >
> > Well, if you completly remove the egr valve all together yes it will
>trip
> > the check engine light. However, you can remove the egr valve from the
> > intake manifold and install a block off plate. On the exhaust manifolds
>you
> > can either install non egr headers or just slap a block off plate on the
> > exhaust manifold. As long as the egr valve is still connected to the
>pcm
> > via its wiring, the pcm stays happy. It doesnt know its not actually
>doing
> > anything.
> >
> > On a side note, I doubt your 92 will see much gain from switching to a
>set
> > of headers. The 92/93 trucks had factory high output manifolds. I
>suspect
> > they flow very closely to that of the jba headers. However the headers
>do
> > look 10x better. really clean up the engine compartment.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Greg Conner
> > 1996 RC
> > 3.9 hybrid
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Gary Hedlin" <ghedlin@theramp.net>
> > >Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > >To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> > >Subject: DML: Re: Re: Possible Group Buy
> > >Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:32:57 -0500
> > >
> > >JBA makes two different sets: EGR and Non-EGR. Removing the EGR (or
> > >disabling it) will definitely trip the MIL.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Gary Hedlin
> > >President
> > >Hedlin Web Designs
> > >http://www.hedlin.net
> > >""Kyle Vanditmars"" <kylevan@telus.net> wrote in message
> > >news:bdcraq$m6b$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> > > >
> > > > ""Gary Hedlin"" <ghedlin@theramp.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:bdb3e3$q8o$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > I was wondering if anyone out there would be interested in a group
>buy
> > >on
> > > > > the JBA headers. Pricing would be about $325 for the 3.9
> > > >
> > > > Hrm... Do the headers have provisions for my '92's EGR valve? If
>not,
> > >what
> > > > can I do about eliminating the system? What will the effects of
> > >removing
> > > > the EGR be both performance and emissions-wise?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:30 EST