It's suppose to to be F/S, but there's been many arguments and I had one
with the tundra solutions guys where I went to dealerships and took pics of
my R/T beside FS Ford, Chevy, Dodges and the Tundra. Even with mine being an
R/T lowered, the two trucks strill looked identical in size, while the other
fullsizes, especially the Ram, dwarfed my truck. I posted these pics up for
em. Also test drove 2 Tundras. They were not awe inspiring. One STALLED
twice for no reason. They were autos, started up, ran for a couple of
seconds, then stalled. Batter was fine, over half a tank of gas. they only
had about 50 miles on em. They creaked like crazy, had negligible power (I
was used to a lightly modded R/T though), the steering was horrid, and it
rode almsot exactly like my friggin' R/T!
Anyhow, that was off topic. LOL
-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Droo" <03dakotacc4.7_4x4@comcast.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: DML: 2004 Dakota update!!!
>
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 09:32:30 -0400, Garret Lewis <ladysmithgwl@1bigred.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> > The Dakota is a good truck. At one time it was the "only kid on the
> > block".
> > Now it has two neighbors. The Toyota Tundra and the Chevrolet Colorado.
> > Hopefully the competition will benefit the development and improvements
> > to
> > the Dakota.
>
> Isn't the Tundra a full size? I know the T100 was mid-size.
>
> --
> -Droo
> Email: 03dakotaCC4.7_4x4@comcast.net
>
> http://www.granroyal.org/dakota
>
> 2003 Dakota Club Cab 4x4, V8 4.7L, Manual Transmission
> Rhino Liner
> Alpine CDA-9807 CD/MP3/WMA Player
> Apline SPS-!70A 6 1/2" Speakers
> Alpine XM Tuner / MTX Thunder 311D Amplifier
> Sony P5 8" Subwoofer / Q-custom Enclosure / Business Consoile
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:46 EST