Re: Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time...

From: andy levy (andy-dml@levyclan.us)
Date: Tue Aug 12 2003 - 15:06:40 EDT

Next message: Jeffery B. Denning: "Re: W32.Blaster.Worm"
Previous message: VRMan: "Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
In reply to: VRMan: "Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Next in thread: digger: "Re: Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Reply: digger: "Re: Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

VRMan wrote:
> 5224? I've been using 3923's.
>
> Why'd you use those over the 3923's?
>
By the book it's the direct replacement. People have reported no ill
effects and some benefits using the 3923s, specifically reduced pinging.

Next message: Jeffery B. Denning: "Re: W32.Blaster.Worm"
Previous message: VRMan: "Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
In reply to: VRMan: "Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Next in thread: digger: "Re: Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Reply: digger: "Re: Re: Used Autolite #5224's for the first time..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:46 EST