Re: that U-Joint check

From: John Bell (john_bell_2@hushmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 20:44:44 EDT


Heh, time for a driveshaft loop...

""BARRY OLIVER"" <DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us> wrote in message
news:sf61f3d6.054@mail.dhs.state.il.us...
>
> That's quite true, but if your U-joint gets tighter, it's getting ready
> to seize...and won't last very long at all, days at most depending on
> driving style. that's when you end up driving along and hearing a sharp
> squeak, a loud snap and the biggest racket you ever heard as your truck
> fishtails to an unplanned stop - if you are lucky and it's the rear. If
> it's the front [joint] you test your truck's pole-vaulting ability
> [Jeeps pole-vault rather well..]
>
> >>> jon@dakota-truck.net 09/12/03 03:29PM >>>
>
> "BARRY OLIVER" <DHSPA58@dhs.state.il.us> wrote:
>
> : If yo uhave 1/4", it's time for new u-joints. Everything should
> feel
> : rock solid by hand... no movement at all.
>
>
> Incidentally, a couple of years ago I was getting some strange
> drivetrain noises from my '96; I took it to the dealer since it
> was still covered under the extended warranty. I mentioned to
> the service manager that I didn't think it was u-joints since
> they didn't have any play, and he said that many times a u-joint
> will actually tighten up as it fails. If that is the case, not
> being able to get any movement out of it does not necessarily
> mean the U-joint is good. Anybody know if there is any truth
> to that?
>
> --
> -Jon-
>
> .-- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com --.
> | 1970 Barracuda - 1990 Dakota 'vert - 1992 Ram 4x4 - 1996 Dakota |
> | 1996 Intruder 1400 - 1996 Kolb FireFly - 2001 Ram QC 3500 CTD |
> `------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com --'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:58 EST