Yeah bernd, if you test a non-x86 architecture chip with a benchmark test
written for x86 architecture chips the non x86 chip is going to run
slow...Thats what they don't tell you.
PC Magazene is only in my bathroom reading rack incase I run out of toilet
paper :)
-- Gary Hedlin President Hedlin Web Designs http://www.hedlin.netGary's Wisdom- #27
-You know the world is comming to an end when wrestlers and body builders run entire states.....What's next, is Bush sending Sgt. Slaughter in to get Osama?? ""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message news:000401c3a0bf$7c018d20$020aa8c0@system... > > They're slower than a 'Vette? (The Dakota's of course) ;) > > Seriously though...even PC Mag (and a few other PC Geek magazines) tested > the new Mac vs. the higher-end PC machines (AMD and Intel). While the Mac > is still (almost) King in the video department, the PC's are better in the > rest of the benchmark tests...including application availability (not saying > that the Mac doesn't have applications, but just look in the software aisles > for yourself). > > Personally, I'd like to see them compare the new 64-Bit machines against the > Mac's...WHO'S YOUR DADDY NOW! :) > > - Bernd > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of andy levy > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 3:12 PM > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net > Subject: Re: DML: clock sync utility > > > > Bernd D. Ratsch wrote: > > > Yuppers. :) > > > > (No Mac's...never have, never will - Proven slower than a PC) ;) > > Just like a Corvette is slower than a Dak. > > It's not a universal truth. For some tasks, one is better than the > other. Of course, one would have to actually *use* one of each for a > little while to form an informed opinion. > > -- > -andy > > http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us > -------------------------------------------- > "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine" > -Bob Tom > -------------------------------------------- >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:07 EST