Re: Ball joints, 55k and still good

From: Gary Hedlin (ghedlin@theramp.net)
Date: Mon Dec 29 2003 - 01:34:07 EST


Heh,

My ball joints are still in good shape...after 173,000 miles!!

I am going to replace them later this year just to be on the safe side. The
moog's so far look like what I'll use. But if I get lazy, I know pep boys
would do the whole job for about $600 (both uppers and lowers).

Now all I need to do is finish my engine rebuild!! :)

-- 
Gary Hedlin
President
Hedlin Web Designs
http://www.hedlin.net
 
Gary's Wisdom- #2
 
-Don't let incompetent people tell you that you don't know what your doing.

On 12/28/03 11:17 PM, in article 00f501c3cdca$7bba4a40$d75f2241@a.tampabay.rr.com, ""Tony Cellana"" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > Just did an oil change on my 2K R/T RC at 83,000. The truck has aftermarket > lower A-arms and stock uppers (as I got it with 7K). No problems with wear > or play. > > TonyC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gmblows@aol.com <Gmblows@aol.com> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net> > Date: Saturday, December 27, 2003 10:42 PM > Subject: Re: DML: Ball joints, 55k and still good > > >> >> I checked mine today too, but I didn't have such luck. >> At 80,500 miles my passenger side upper is very loose, >> lowers are fine, and driver side upper is marginal. >> '99 2WD CC >> ...off to check the archive for part #'s >> BTW I will be saving the old ones and my receipts just in case. >> >>> I was reading all the ball joint horror stories so I checked mine today. >>> I've got 55,600 on 2000 4x4 QC, and they are still tight. I was > actually >>> a bit surprised. >>> >>> I wonder what the criteria are for early failure, any ideas? >>> >>> /Curt >>> Chelsea, MI >>> >> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:13 EST