B1LLYW@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/2/2004 5:15:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> bpracing@worldnet.att.net writes:
>
>
>
>>Now a Fastman 52 with my combination.... yeah!! (for those of the
>>F&B persuasion, their 52 would have worked for me too, but at a higher cost.
>>they are pretty, though)
>>
>
>
> You're better off with an F&B 50mm than a Fastman 52mm.
Bill, your post seemed to get cut off before the explanation of why.
-- -andyhttp://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us -------------------------------------------- "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine" -Bob Tom --------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:48 EST