Gabriel A. Couriel wrote:
> as for your claim that the use of the truck at the track is insurance fraud,
> i would say that it isn't, considering that "insurance" does not cover
> warranty (warranty is a TOTALLY seperate item under the Uniform Commercial
> Code (UCC)). thus, there wouldn't be an insurance fraud argument (let's not
> even get to the level of intent/action needed).
If the "extended warranty" is actually a service contract (more or less
an insurance policy - does anyone actually read these things before they
buy/sign them? it sounds like they don't), and states that racing the
vehicle will void the contract, you are committing fraud if you break
the truck at the track on Sunday and tell the dealer on Monday that you
didn't race it. Bearing false witness, lying, call it whatever you want.
If you are still under a real warranty, things will get quite a bit muddier.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:49 EST