RE: RE: 255/60-15 On A Gen II

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (fasstdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 21 2004 - 20:49:55 EST

Next message: Jay & Dana: "Re: more power an better mileage???"
Previous message: Jay & Dana: "Re: Re: Autolites & gas mileage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Yup

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of B1LLYW@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:12 PM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: 255/60-15 On A Gen II

In a message dated 2/21/2004 8:09:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
fasstdak@hotmail.com writes:

> My old partner was running 255/55's on his '96 (Gen-II) Dak. No
> rubbing at all.
>
> - Bernd
>

On his Enkei's, Bernd?

Bill White - KRC Performance

http://www.bionicdodge.com

'95 Dakota CC 4x2 - 408 is done, truck isn't
'03 Ram 1500 QC 4x4 Hemi Off-Road

Next message: Jay & Dana: "Re: more power an better mileage???"
Previous message: Jay & Dana: "Re: Re: Autolites & gas mileage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:04 EST