-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2/25/2004 9:48 PM, Kyle Vanditmars wrote:
|
| Bernd D. Ratsch wrote:
|
|> Stick with the Mopar fluid. Can't say who the customer is, but there
|> was a
|> newer Ram in the shop that switched over to "full synthetics" all around
|> (including the trans). Transmission was toasted (clutches and seals)
|> at 45K
|> miles.
|>
|> - Bernd
|>
|
| If the fluid meets ATF+4 specs, it meets ATF+4 specs. Why should there
| be any noticeable difference, except maybe fluid life?
But the bottle David was referencing didn't say that it met ATF+4.
"He pulled out a tech bulliten from Valvoline stating that their MaxLife
ATF meets Chrsylers ATF+4 specs (the bottle only stated it met Chrysler
specs)."
That sounds more like an afterthought "yeah, it's fine to use, whatever"
message than solid documentation.
- --
- -andy
http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
- --------------------------------------------
"Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
-Bob Tom
- --------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFAPYMTxPJNBidNgHkRAl8wAJ4jpY2FOW/jvtyPMyslV3xHFHVU3QCfWbok
KvBSF+9RtQfDte6DQ2FRLfI=
=mdB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:04 EST