Re: Re: Rule Of Wheeling # 11

From: Josh Battles (jbattles@bankfinancial.com)
Date: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 12:25:20 EDT

Next message: Ed Estoppey: "Re: Boneyards??"
Previous message: Mike Burgess: "Need workshop, can supply case of <insert beverage here>"
In reply to: Terrible Tom: "Re: Re: Rule Of Wheeling # 11"
Next in thread: andy levy: "Re: Re: Rule Of Wheeling # 11"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Terrible Tom" <SilverEightynine@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> Josh Battles wrote:
> > so, what's rule #11?
> >
>
> Arugh - I knew someone was gonna notice I screwed up on the numbering.
>
> Rule Of Wheeling # 11 :
>
> "Refer to Rule Of Wheeling # 9: 'Stock Sucks' "
>
> :D hehehe

and it only took 3 minutes! yay me!

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
www.omg-stfu.com

Next message: Ed Estoppey: "Re: Boneyards??"
Previous message: Mike Burgess: "Need workshop, can supply case of <insert beverage here>"
In reply to: Terrible Tom: "Re: Re: Rule Of Wheeling # 11"
Next in thread: andy levy: "Re: Re: Rule Of Wheeling # 11"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 01 2004 - 12:00:17 EDT