On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:28:15 -0400, DAKSY <rsmith13@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Hey, Droo
>
> <snip> I think the gen3's are less aerodynamic than the gen2's.<snip>
>
> Wow! Not even a "duck-n-run" after that statement? I disagree with you,
> based on the bodacious curves of the Gen3s, but that's my opinion &
> unless
> we can find the results of aerodynamic (windtunnel) tests, we'll have to
> live with our own feelings...
>
> But, I think the Gen1s were more "bricklike" than the 2s or 3s!
>
> D-n-R...
>
I think I read it on here a few years ago. I'm not sure where I heard it.
But if I am remembering correctly, the reason for it was because of the
fenders. They disrupted the air or something. I dunno. I could be wrong. :P
-- -Droo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 00:15:18 EDT