On Oct 4, 2004, at 18:41, Stlaurent CIV Steven wrote:
>
> Michael, stop embarrassing yourself by leaping into Andy's immature
> statements.
advice considered, and rejected based on improper prefix to "statements"
>
> You beginning to sound like someone with a HUGE CHIP on your shoulder
> or trying to defend a LAME statement.
If I can do that in two posts, I'm clearly a raging success.
>
> Andy has and still remains an ignorant individual (previous history
> being on this forum). d If you had any sense about you, you would
> observed that I don't work for or even signed my name at the bottom of
> this DCx news report. However, I see that is not the case. Pointless
> and immature.
>
> Do you have a clue what plagiarism means? Did I say I wrote it? Can
> you access this account? Are you a DCx employee?
since you didn't attribute it, nor was it a forward, it was only by
assumption that I decided you were not the author. Also, there was far
more hard info and far too little personal attack in the press releases
to have been written by you, it seems, so it wasn't 100% pure
assumption.....
oh, and ya. I know what plagiarism means.
>
> However, I am self correcting and there is a method in approaching
> someone, asking for references. In his case, it shows some serious
> personality issues.
on someone's part.
you seem clearly uninterested in a civil discussion on proper
attribution, and this is not worth a flame war (though it's been a good
long while since we've had one here...), so this will be my last post
on the subject unless attitudes change.
-- Michael Maskalans <http://mike.tepidcola.com/> mobile.612.618.4652 home.585.935.7129
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST