Rascal what nationality does "Bushbrains" derive from. lol
>From: "Rick Barnes" <barnesrv@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Subject: RE: DML: DCX News: Dakota engine choices and performance grows
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:55:03 -0400
>
>
>I wish they did monitor this site, maybe then they would have thought more
>about putting a HEMI in the DAKOTA!!!! Ahem....mah name is Rascal W.
>Bushbrains and I approved this here message...
>
>Rascal
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bernd D.
>Ratsch
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:06 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: RE: DML: DCX News: Dakota engine choices and performance grows
>
>
>
>Yup...totally correct. I would also hope that NDA's weren't broken (as
>they
>are with internal information being posted to the public without proper
>consent). Even as a tech, there are a lot of things that I can't post as
>some of the internal info that I see isn't for public viewing (until
>released).
>
>Be careful with what you post - DC does monitor the larger websites that
>are
>Dodge/Chrysler related.
>
>- Bernd
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of andy levy
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:36 PM
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: DCX News: Dakota engine choices and performance grows
>
>If you need a "special account" or have be a DCX employee to access the
>information, doesn't that imply that the information is not for
>dissemination to the general public? Otherwise, wouldn't it be on
>http://media.daimlerchrysler.com or in an actual press release? I have
>access to lots of "news" at work which, if my employer found I had been
>posting online, would land me in a heap of trouble. Some things aren't
>supposed to be broadcast.
>
>- --
>- -andy
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST