josh likes cheese!
>From: "Josh Battles" <josh@omg-stfu.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: RE: RANT! - ATTN Steven Stlaurent
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:44:09 -0500
>
>""Stlaurent CIV Steven"" <steven.stlaurent@usmc.mil> wrote in message
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that Tom read all the same posts that I did, because
>I've
> > come to the same conclusion that he did. Your posts have been nothing
>but
> > agitating to this list and your recent rejoining and battering of
>members
> > will NOT be tolerated.
> >
> > From his perspective, I seriously doubted it. Since you do not have a
>clue
>on the previous past fallout or maybe naïve, it may be fruitful for you to
>read and digest past archives before passing any judgmental comments.
>However, I really don't know who you are or your position here. Regard to
>battling members, maybe you need to do some talking to other members here.
> >
> > However, reading comprehension is a serious problem as I see with some
>here. It goes with Tom or anyone else.
>
>I've been a member here since I got my truck in 2000 and have been here to
>see all of your past fallouts with other members. Leaving when after you
>wrecked your truck was the best thing you ever did for the list, IMO.
>
> > A "non-adult immature approach" huh? I'm glad to see that you can
> > read/write at 4th grade level. Maybe the "downfall" here is that you're
>a
> > pompous ass and you don't know how to effectively communicate with
>others.
> > Andy's comment was neither argumentative nor immature, he only wanted
>you
>to
> > properly attribute your sources.
> >
> > A "non-adult immature approach" huh? I'm glad to see that you can
> > read/write at 4th grade level. Maybe the "downfall" here is that you're
>a
> > pompous ass and you don't know how to effectively communicate with
>others.
> > Andy's comment was neither argumentative or immature, he only wanted you
>to
> > properly attribute your sources.
> >
> >
> > I see you have a problem in detecting sarcasm. Defensiveness stance was
>taken in response. Maybe that will give you insight. With communications
>and
>4th grade level, that one made me laugh. Who pompous one here?
> >
> > However, comments are welcome.
>
>good job double quoting me.
>
>Those who know me also know that i'm one of the most sarcastic people
>they've ever met. I don't have a problem either detecting or using
>sarcasm.
>I'll concede that at times I can come off condescending and/or pompous, but
>you on the other hand rejoind the group and started off on the wrong foot.
>
>--
>- Josh
>Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>Above Statement Not True ^^^^^
>www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST