But as I mentioned in an earlier post; The new all the Hemi demensions
beforehand; there was no excuse to try to consolidate the mechanicals to
cause more complications.
Unless they narrowed the framerails so they could use longer control arms to
get that nice carlike ride. It which case.. I'd still rather have the Hemi
and a harsher ride.
When I buy a truck; I generally expect it to ride like a truck.. what a
coincidence.
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "andy levy" <andy-dml@levyclan.us>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Hemi Dakota? Not Likely.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/5/2004 6:48 PM, Aaron Wyse wrote:
>
> | And now we're expected to belive that with the Gen IV being bigger
> yet, that
> | is's got the smallest engine compartment of them all. I don't believe
it
> | one bit.
>
> Depends on where the suspension mount points come in and where other
> things "encroach." Gary, got engine compartment pix?
>
>
> - --
> - -andy
>
> http://home.rochester.rr.com/alevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us
> - --------------------------------------------
> "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine"
> -Bob Tom
> - --------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFBY0ROxPJNBidNgHkRArKCAJwPct2eimcKIOHVY6aEb7vPOKafvQCeJXP2
> zYjPtqfy+TGZS6JbceziraI=
> =M5ck
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST