Re: 2006 Dakota R/T

From: Chad Evans (hemidak@msn.com)
Date: Wed Oct 06 2004 - 11:04:36 EDT


John i did say 2000 r/t. although i forgot to mention i want a club cab.
a few people who are this list know who i will be working for. i should say
have heard me talk about him.

>From: jon@dakota-truck.net
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: 2006 Dakota R/T
>Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
>
>"Jason Bleazard" <dml@bleazard.net> wrote:
>
>: On Tue, October 5, 2004 2:41 pm, Stlaurent CIV Steven said:
>:>
>:> Hmm...sorry Josh. You never caught it. Let me repost this. (laughter)
>:>> this Dakota loyalist wont buy one. My next truck will be an 2000 r/t.
>:>
>:> 2006 Dodge Dakota R/T (SRT)? Not even a 06 model?
>:> You see what happen when you are critical?
>
>: This is kind of scary... I think I sort of understand what he's trying to
>: say. If I were to attempt a translation from St.Laurent to English, I
>: believe it would be something along the lines of:
>
>
> Hmmm, yep I would have to agree. I think there are probably
>some things we are just all better off not understanding. ;-)
>
>
>: "You have stated that you will not buy a gen IV, but that instead your
>: next truck will be a used 2000 R/T. However, would you be willing to
>: reconsider if I were to tell you that there will be an equivalent to the
>: R/T, in the form of an upcoming SRT model in 2006?"
>
>: Feel free to correct me if I've translated incorrectly.
>
>
> Hmmm, I got something different (then again, translation
>into english for certain people is more of an art than a
>science anyway, so I suppose multiple interpretations may
>even be valid) ;-) ... anyway, what I got out of it was:
>
>
> "You have stated that you will not buy a gen IV, but that
>instead your next truck will be a 2000 R/T. Because I have no
>reading comprehension skills, and I could never conceive of
>somebody purchasing a used truck (perish the thought), I will
>assume that you typo'd and meant to say 2006 R/T. There is no
>such thing as a 2006 R/T, and even if there was, it would be
>called an SRT, not an R/T, so you are just all kinds of wrong."
>
>
> I lay my interpretation out for the world to judge. :-)
>
>--
> -Jon-
>
> .-- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com --.
> | 1970 Barracuda - 1990 Dakota 'vert - 1992 Ram 4x4 - 1996 Dakota |
> | 1996 Intruder 1400 - 1996 Kolb FireFly - 2001 Ram QC 3500 CTD |
> `------------------------------------ http://www.jonsteiger.com --'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST