Re: RE: 318 vs 390 power

From: Josh Battles (josh@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Thu Dec 16 2004 - 15:23:21 EST

Next message: Josh Battles: "Re: RE: RE: RE: Gen 1/2 question - Speaker enclosures"
Previous message: Pindell, Timothy: "RE: RE: RE: Gen 1/2 question - Speaker enclosures"
In reply to: greg conner: "RE: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Next in thread: greg conner: "Re: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Reply: greg conner: "Re: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

greg conner wrote:

>
> Those custom, one-off, made in house slide-a-links?
>
> =P
> Greg Conner
> 1996 RC
> 3.9 hybrid

don't nitpick just to nitpick.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
Above Statement Not True    ^^^^^
www.omg-stfu.com

Next message: Josh Battles: "Re: RE: RE: RE: Gen 1/2 question - Speaker enclosures"
Previous message: Pindell, Timothy: "RE: RE: RE: Gen 1/2 question - Speaker enclosures"
In reply to: greg conner: "RE: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Next in thread: greg conner: "Re: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Reply: greg conner: "Re: RE: 318 vs 390 power"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:48:08 EST