they didn't make 300 during the chargers hey day??? They made 300s from
1956 to 1971, again in 1979 and them again with the 300M.
>From: "Zachary Burcham" <roadking_dakota@hotmail.com>
>>
>So the EXACT reiteration is a rebadged 300? They didn't even make 300s
>during the Charger's hay day. I really think that Dodge is just throwing
>around a lot of retro names to get interest, but not backing it up at all.
>As stated, the concept Charger that floats around in shows is a real
>iteration, it's even a 4 door I believe, but the 2nd set of doors are hard
>to see. And while the Charger was a big car, I don't see a 426 Hemi in
>this one. All cars were big then, and the charger was too, but they had
>big motors to push them. And lets face it if it keeps going the Hemi will
>be in every car in the DC line-up just to say it is. It's as much a
>Charger as the Ram was a Rumble Bee or GTX. I just think it's a complete
>crock comparable with the (sarcastic comment coming...)oh so venerable
>Silverado SS!
>
>You show me a Charger that was a rebadged version of a European inspired
>sport-touring sedan and I'll admit defeat but that's EXACTLY what this car
>is.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 00:18:31 EST