Barry Oliver wrote:
>
> TerribleTom wrote:
>>> Hmmm - I liked those renderings - but I took it upon myself to go a
>>> few steps further.
>>>
>>> I decided to alter the images to give an idea of what I think could
>>> have been done to make the Charger a little more attractive, to me at
>>> least.
>
> Not bad. did you do 2 pics to show open and closed or just two options.
> I think I like the hoodlines and body of the original picture, although
> I could do without the BMW-esque styling. But then, I don't have a
> better idea, and I am not likely to ever be in the market for one either....
Considering that I boogered up the URLs - AGAIN - did you see this one?
http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/stuff/charger_art2.jpg ??
I think you just hit a nail on the head when you said you don't like the
BMW-esque style. Perhaps that is what has been bugging me the most and
I have not been able to put my finger on it. But yeah - it looks too
much like a BMW in its production form.
No I didn't do any other versions except those two - I can't really get
great amounts of quality out of freehanding with this crummy freeware
program I have.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Attention Infidels: I am your official DBDoMPfIWUMOT! Terrible Tom -- AIM & Yahoo Name: SilverEightynine http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 00:18:31 EST
