RE: window = smashed

From: baddak@excite.com
Date: Fri Feb 18 2005 - 16:49:26 EST


In article
<812E00034E1CFA4FA406EB2B88D648C00264517C@ocexchange2003.otterbein.edu>,
TPindell@otterbein.edu ("Pindell, Timothy") writes:

    While searching for IT jobs, let me know if there are any tool and die
shops also. I would love to live in an area with less crime and no snow, well
mostly...
  Mike
>
>
> #-----Original Message-----
> #From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-
> #truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Barry Oliver
> #Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:14 PM
> #To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> #Subject: Re: DML: window = smashed
> #
> #
> #Rick Barnes wrote:
> #> Isn't that hilarious Jimmy? Here in Kennesaw, Georgia, you are
> REQUIRED
> #to
> #> own a firearm...btw, Kennesaw, Georgia has the lowest violent crime
> rate
> #of
> #> any city in the U.S.
> #>
> #> Rascal
> #>
> #
> #I need to move there... Know of any IT jobs?
>
> According to the City of Kennesaw Code of Ordinances Section 34-1,
> paragraph b., it seems that one isn't required to have a firearm in
> their house if they don't want one. To my sophomoric legal mind, the
> ordinance seems to leave enough wiggle room so as not to be
> Constitutionally problematic. Am I reading this right? (Or Left?)
>
> Is the cause of the low crime rate due to people actually defending
> themselves and killing criminals in the act, or is it the
> weapon-friendly nature of the municipality that gives criminals cause to
> consider a target they perceive as weaker? What is the ratio of
> criminals killed per attempted felony? Has the law increased the number
> of firearms used in home defense, or just increased the perception by
> criminals that a firearm may be present? I'm not trying to be a jerk.
> As a gun-owner myself, I just find the topic interesting.
>
> http://www.kennesaw.ga.us/CodeOfOrdinances.aspx
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 10:04:31 EST