Re: 100k = timing chain?

From: baddak@excite.com
Date: Mon Feb 21 2005 - 12:39:16 EST


In article <cvd4bl$bhm$1@bent.twistedbits.net>, josh@omg-stfu.com (Josh
Battles) writes:
>
>
> B1LLYW@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 2/21/2005 7:55:52 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > david.clement@verizon.net writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >>My 89 3.9 had 256,000 miles on it on the orignal timing chain when I sold
> >>the
> >>truck.
> >
> >
> > Sheer and unadulterated luck.
> >
> > Bill White - KRC Performance
>
> I've got 73k HARD miles on my little V6 and it's still on the original
> stock timing chain. I don't get any noise from it at all.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> Above Statement Not True ^^^^^
> www.omg-stfu.com

   Changed mine at 32,000 (very hard miles) and it had a LOT of slop in it. I
agree the factory is junk. Just some lucky individuals out here..

Mike



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 10:04:31 EST