Re: OT: Dodge Charger Experience!

From: david.clement@verizon.net
Date: Fri Jun 10 2005 - 10:01:33 EDT


In article <d8b1al$u6v$1@bent.twistedbits.net>, superdak@gmail.com (Gary
Hedlin) writes:
>
>
> Now the Charger. You've got a totally new concept that is supposed to
> appeal to a large base of customers. But the problem is you're
> excluding the older generation who might actually remember a 70's
> charger, and your excluding the younger generation that cant pony up the
> 30k sticker price. So who do you have left, not many. Your not
> marketing it to the families and soccermoms which are the biggest
> customer base because they dont give a flying flock about
> performance....and your sure as jello not marketing it to people that
> need something pretty to occupy their stall at the retirement home. So
> who are you targeting??
>

Gary,

The Charger at $22k-$30K slots right in there with the bread an butter cars
from GM and Ford. Impala ($22k-$28K), Ford 500 ($22k-$28k), Grand Prix
($23k-$29k). The Charger in base form it has a significant peformance advantage
over the others and at the high end a huge performance advantage. Whether the
performance advantage and unique styling is enough for the Charger to take
market share away from these cars or not remains to be seen but based on the
success of the 300 and Magnum I would guess it will. The market for fairly
large reasonably priced sedan is large.

In regards to the 05 Dakota, I like the looks and the more I see them on the
road the more I like what they did with the styling. Also, based on the numbers
I am seeing on the road I would say DC has another winner.

Dave Clement
99 SLT+ CC 4x4



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 01 2005 - 09:48:06 EDT