Jason Bleazard wrote:
> On Sun, August 21, 2005 9:40 pm, Josh Battles said:
>
>>That would be crossing the line. You would also be assuring yourself
>>immediate retalliation with extreme prejudice.
>
>
> Oh, come now. The stuff is harmless. It doesn't do any permanent harm to
> the vehicle. It says so right on their web site. They couldn't put it on
> the Internet if it wasn't true.
>
What about pain and suffering and mental anguish? [Inflicted by Josh on
the unlucky prankster] "Secondary causality" counts, you know...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2008 - 19:13:05 EST