RE: '64 Hemi!

From: Tom \ (prodog@swbell.net)
Date: Mon Nov 21 2005 - 21:45:08 EST


Didn't those have a 413 wedge motor in them?

Later,

Tom "Slick" North

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted in this electronic mail messages, sent from
tbn0007@unt.edu, prodog@swbell.net, or tnorth@hotmail.com is:
1) intended only for the person, persons, entity, or entities to which it is
addressed to
2) contains confidential and/or privileged materials.

In the case of confidential and/or privileged materials, any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in
reliance upon these materials, by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient may be the subject of legal action.

If you receive an email in error from tbn0007@unt.edu, prodog@swbell.net, or
tnorth@hotmail.com, please:
1) contact the sender;
2) delete the material from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
> DR CHALLENGER
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:34 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: RE: DML: '64 Hemi!
>
>
>
> it aint original. MA MOPAR never put a 426 Hemi in a full size car.
>
>
> >From: "Rick Barnes" <rascal@scrtc.com>
> >>
> >Ok, you guys are wise in the ways of the Hemi....
> >Any ideas as to the value of a 1964 Chrysler 300 with a 426
> (or so I am
> >told) Hemi in it. It is all original.
> >Gotta guy offering it to me...what do you think?
> >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 10:10:44 EST