RE: RE: RE: Ram vs Dakota belt question

From: Rick Barnes (rascal@scrtc.com)
Date: Sun Dec 04 2005 - 10:25:14 EST


Yah, you beat me by 11 minutes...I was making coffee...lol

Rascal

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Ray Block
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:08 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: RE: RE: Ram vs Dakota belt question

Ahh, great minds think alike! :-) Rascal, look at the time stamps of our
replies to Bob and methinks we were typing at the same time.

Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net [mailto:owner-dakota-
> truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Rick Barnes
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:36 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: RE: Ram vs Dakota belt question
>
>
> I dunno, but go to rockauto.com and look up both numbers and see if they
> are
> the same.
>
> Rascal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bob Tom
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 7:20 AM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Ram vs Dakota belt question
>
>
> To all you multiple vehicle owners :-) , do you happen to know
> if the Gen III Dakota serp. belt for 5.2/5.9 is the same in length
> as, say, one used on a 98 Ram?
>
> My guess is yes because I can't see a different pulley system
> between Dakota and Ram but you never know >:-} TIA.
>
> Bob
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 01 2006 - 00:39:43 EST