Re: How many others with the 4.7 at 92,000 had to...

From: Ed McCarrick (edmccarrick@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 31 2006 - 23:42:56 EST


--- Terrible Tom <SilverEightynine@aol.com> wrote:

>
> Ed McCarrick wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Mine just flipped over to 93K digger all is ok so
> far
> > (crosses fingers)
> >
> > Ed
> > '00 QC 4.7 4x4
> >
>
>
> Funny you mentioned that Ed. I was just wondering
> today how many miles
> your truck had. I was driving to work and saw a Quad
> Cab on the side of
> the road and thought, gee, I've been seeing lots of
> Quads lately. Which
> made me think that they were released in the 2000
> model year - which
> made me think that wow - Ed's "new" Dak is already 6
> years old which
> made me think of a post you sent a while back that
> you had such and such
> number of miles on your truck and didn't have to
> have the brakes dont
> yet, and someone said its probably because you use
> the engine/tranny to
> downshift and slow down before hitting the brakes,
> which made me wonder
> just how many miles you had on it :)
>
> FYI - I did not think you had that many miles - I
> was thinking in the
> 75K range

Well Tom I don't have the original front brakes
anymore. The original battery, as of a few months ago,
has passed on.

Ed

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

.
.
.------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! |
| Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 02 2006 - 18:27:16 EDT