The new body grows on you after a while.. Just give it a chance. My
concern is more that every time the redo the Dak it gets bigger. The
current Dak is about as large as full size trucks from 20 years ago.
And, Yes, I too would wish they'd do a 6.1L Dakota; but I expect at LEAST
the 5.7L to be called an R/T. R/T should be more unique than graphic. If
they came with a 5.7L as standard with a 6.1L optional.... Then I think I
could be moving some Dakotas. I'd also end up dealing with people wanting
a 6.1L with tow pacakages, and other odd combinations.
Like the guys that have called things like the towing for the SRT-10, or
fuel mileage for the Dodge POWER WAGON.
Aaron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chad Evans" <hemidak@msn.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:23 AM
Subject: Re: DML: 2006 Dakota R/T
>
> Uh i know that. i didnt know the current dak is desired to begin with.
>
> and why stick the 6-speed behind the 5.7 ? just go with the 6.1
>
>
> >From: "Aaron Wyse" <awyse@sw.rr.com>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Subject: Re: DML: 2006 Dakota R/T
> >Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 22:20:37 -0500
> >
> >
> >There is am R/T version of the current Dak.. that's what we've been
> >talking
> >about. It's just not as impressive as desired.
> >I would want lower profile tires, a 5.7L , 6 speed manual trans.,about
2-3
> >inches lower stance
> >Aaron
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Chad Evans" <hemidak@msn.com>
> >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 4:28 PM
> >Subject: Re: DML: 2006 Dakota R/T
> >
> >
> > >
> > > IMO i would encourage dodge to make the r/t in the current dak.
.
.
.------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Make your plans NOW to attend the National DML Meet in Colorado! |
| Date: July 15-23, 2006 - More info: http://meet.dakota-truck.net |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 09:31:34 EDT