Re: Daimler confims talks to dump Chrysler

From: droo (03dakotacc4.7_4x4@comcast.net)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2007 - 18:29:01 EDT


On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:47:55 -0400, <msnbcnnbcbs@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Why have dodges cars and trucks gotten so damn ugly in the last 4
> years?! I
> always looked at dodge as a company that made vehicles that had lots of
> visual
> appeal.
>
> The first "big-rig" generation ram
> The gen-3 Dak
> The 2-door 2004'ish chrysler sebring
> the minivans
> The intrepid (ok, i liked this one, it was personal)
>
>
>
> The Dak is a glaring example of why the company is failing. Take a
> formula that
> was succeeding, and throw it right out the window. Instead, try the
> tried-and-failed method of *comformity*. The current Dak is (in my
> opinion) one
> of the UGLIEST looking vehicles on the road, and the 2008 model isnt
> doing much
> better. Then they take another half-assed shot at improving its image by
> upping
> the 4.7's power to where it should have been YEARS ago. (btw, i cant
> wait to
> see the sticker price on a dak equipped with that new "H.O." engine) The
> truck
> is TOO DAMN HEAVY. Wheres the hemi-powered dak at?!
>

I disagree a little about Dodges look. Some of the new vehicles I'm not
crazy about, but I generally like their look. I don't know what you mean
when you say they are doing the "tried and failed method of conformity". I
think their designs are quite different from alot of what is out there. I
don't find the current generation of the dakotas to be too far away from
what they were.

-- 
-droo

2003 Dodge Dakota Club Cab V8 4X4 Manual Transmission Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revo's Can-Back Soft Topper Rhinoliner Alpine CD Head Unit w/ XM Alpine 6 3/4" Speakers Sony 8" Subwoofer Q-Logic Custom Fit Enclosure



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2007 - 19:04:35 EDT