Maybe, if could perform actual work duty. I get comments about why I should
have gotten a Ram instead of my Dak. My Dak has the 4.7 H.O. It is quicker
than a similarly equipped Ram and could probably give a Hemi Ram a run for
its money. It hold the wife and kids just fine and tows my small boat with
ease. I will use it this year to tow my Neon SCCA car. Why should I have
spent another $8K on a Ram?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pindell, Tim P" <TPindell@otterbein.edu>
To: <dml@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:50 PM
Subject: RE: DML: is this the end of the Dakota?
>
>
>>
>> I think that if a decision were to be made between the Dak
>> and the Ram, the Dak would be the one to get the axe, simply
>> because the Ram already has the full size truck pedigree.
> snip
>>
>> --
>> -Jon-
>>
>> .- Jon Steiger -- jon@dakota-truck.net or jon@jonsteiger.com -.
>> | '96 Kolb Firefly, '96 Suzuki Intruder, Miscellaneous Mopars |
>> `-------------------------------- http://www.jonsteiger.com --'
>>
>
> Are we going to see a collapse of platforms like we did in the 80s? I
> agree. There is so little distinction (to me) between the Dak and a SB
> Ram, especially in the 'burbs, that I wondered why the Dak lasted so
> long. Would there be demand for a real compact pickup?
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST