Looking at the raider, it seems like they took all the "good" options from it
last year. You couldn't get a V8 in a club cab, no rear gear options... The 07
raider just made no sense.
I too would like to see them shrink the dakota back down. Stick with one chassy
length for the three options: quad cab with short bed, extended cab with
regular bed, and single cab with long bed.
IMO if a quad cab is an option, they should not put rear doors on an extended
cab. If somebody chooses a extended cab over a quad cab, they obviously made
the choice that the trucks other abilities are more important than extra seating
convenience. So stick to two doors and save that 300 lbs.
mm
---------------------- Original Message: ---------------------
From: "Aaron Wyse" <awyse@sw.rr.com>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Subject: Re: DML: is this the end of the Dakota?
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:09:48 +0000
>
> I feel they should cut the Dakota back down some in size; The current models
> are almost as large as the 80's full size trucks were.\
> Until the latest incarnation; the Dakotas were popular.
> I disagree with the 6 cyl diesel Dak.. a good sized 4 cyl diesel; 3.5L to
> 4L.
> As for the Mitsubitchi Raider.. I see too many on the road.. why buy the
> same truck with worse depreciation and less warranty.
> Chrysler needs to stop blaming the products for thier lack of marketing or
> all the times that cost cutting has shot themselves in the foot.
>
> They're going all in thinking the 09 Ram is going to take over the market;
> but dropping the Mega cab for just a crew cab, and putting an even shorter
> bed on it.
> Aaron Wyse
> Dothan Chrysler Dodge sales
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian" <hskr@cox.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:02 PM
> Subject: RE: DML: is this the end of the Dakota?
>
>
> >
> > The ranger isn't the same compact truck it was a few years ago. It has
> > grown right along with the S-10 to compete better with the Dakota. I
> still
> > can't foresee Dodge axing the mid-size truck. Maybe axing the name
> Dakota,
> > but there will still be amid-size truck. Throw in a 6 cyl diesel engine
> and
> > ditch the V8s.
> >
> > brian cropp
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Andy Levy
> > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 7:55 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: is this the end of the Dakota?
> >
> >
> > On Feb 8, 2008 8:38 AM, Brian <hskr@cox.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > The dealer network thing has already taken place. And as long as Ford,
> > > Chevy, and Toyota still sell a mid size truck, Dodge will too.
> >
> > Ford doesn't sell a midsize truck. The Ranger is still a compact, and
> > it's gone after the '09 model year.
> >
> > Chevy *makes* a midsize truck, but they aren't selling. And really
> > haven't since they were introduced.
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 02 2008 - 02:10:10 EST