My prediction is that the deal will happen which will push GM into
bankruptcy and the treasury will use it's newly aquired powers to take
it over. It will then be able to sell cars below cost and the EPA will
make rules to further encourage people to buy cars from the
government's auto maker. Then ford will collapse and it too will be
consumed by the state. If this sounds far fetched just look at the
hundreds of billions of dollars in government take overs in the
financial sector over the last month.
On 10/11/08, Tom Byrne <kerib@ptd.net> wrote:
>
> GM is on the verge of Ch. XI. The market won't like this deal and will
> selloff GM shares and bonds pushing it into bankruptcy. I doubt the deal is
> completed.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ray Irons" <rayirons@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 1:26 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: Gm Chrysler Merger?
>
>
>>
>> I don't know about that. From what I read in a snippet from the Wall
>> Street Journal, Cerberus; which owns a little over 80% of Chrysler and 51%
>>
>> of GMAC, proposed trading Chrysler's automotive operations to GM in
>> exchange for GM's remaining 49 percent stake in GMAC. This could be very
>> attractive to GM as it would allow itself to shed the currently risky
>> mortgage portion of its business while at the same time acquiring more
>> manufacturing or eliminating a competiter. WSJ Sources also state that
>> while the talks are currently stalled due to the financial crisis, they
>> could resume once the markets settle down. They gone on to say the chances
>>
>> of a merger are about 50-50.
>>
>> My personal opinion is either way it sounds bad to me. GM wants to own
>> Chrysler for whatever reason and Cerebus wants to dump it after just
>> buying it from Daimler a little over a year ago.
>>
>>
>> --- On Sat, 10/11/08, Tom Byrne <kerib@ptd.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Tom Byrne <kerib@ptd.net>
>>> Subject: DML: Re: Gm Chrysler Merger?
>>> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>>> Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 12:31 PM
>>> Old news. The talks already ended and have gone nowhere. It
>>> really does not
>>> make sense for GM. It needs fewer brands, not more.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "DAKSY" <rsmith13@nycap.rr.com>
>>> To: "Dakota Mailing List"
>>> <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2008 7:10 AM
>>> Subject: DML: Gm Chrysler Merger?
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > From today's NY Times:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/business/11auto.html?_r=1&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1223723313-YHKzoRfSrr2RdsqAI0gmdQ
>>> >
>>> > Bob (DAKSY) Smith
>>> > DAKSY2K on AIM
>>> > 2K SY Dakota Sport +
>>> > V-6 4 x 4 5 speed
>>> > 2K08 HD Softail CrossBones
>>> > Satin Black (Not Yellow)
>>> > http://home.nycap.rr.com/daksy/
>>> > Averill Park, NY
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 10:23:36 EDT