Re: Low resale value on '96 model?!?

From: Michael Clark (mike@snakebite.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 1997 - 02:36:37 EST


Nelson Sendino wrote:
>
> I was a little disappointed when 2 months after I signed five year lease I
> saw a picture of the '97 Dakota. One thing I keep in mind that helps ease
> buyers remorse is that all options being equal, the 92-96s should be faster
> than the new model by virtue of its smaller size and lighter weight.
>
> Nelson '95 V8 Auto

Motor Trend reported a '97 reg. cab short box V8 auto with 3.92 gears
ran a 16.7/82.7 quarter. That seems really slow for a v8 Dakota. You
might be right. I hope the '98 R/T doesn't let us down.

Michael Clark mike@snakebite.com
'93 v8 auto

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:34 EDT