Re: 97 SLT Chrome bumper

From: L. J. Morris (ljohn@alltel.net)
Date: Wed Apr 16 1997 - 07:49:03 EDT


Mark;

I guess this sort of proves that the OEM manufacturer is using MEDIUM
quality original parts instead of HIGH quality parts to either contain
costs or most importantly boost profits.

L. John Morris<ljohn@alltel.net>
!!!!! ... your local *HEMI* owner ...!!!!!
'97 SLT+ CC 4x4
5.2L, 5spd, 3.92SG

----------
> From: Mark Jones <mjones@ngl.ca>
> Date: Wednesday, April 16, 1997 6:38 AM
>
> I have a 94 that within 6 months had both bumpers and 4 rims replace
> because of the chrome rusting. In fact the front bumper was replaced a
> second time within about a month because the replacement started rusting.

> Very poor quality chroming process.
>
> Mark
>
> ----------
> > From: axeman <andrews3@ghplus.infi.net>
> > Date: Monday, April 14, 1997 7:07 PM
> >
> > Anyone out there had problems with rust on the chrome rear bumper on
> > there SLT. My brother in law has one and has had the rear bumper
> > replaced once and rust is coming back. Told him he should have bought
> > the sport !!
> >

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:37 EDT