Re: Dakota vs Ford Lightning

From: Sean P Meldrum (Sean_P_Meldrum@Auto.ittind.com)
Date: Fri May 02 1997 - 06:56:57 EDT


     This doesn't suprise me at all. I was originally lookin' at
     Lightnings as I've got an older Mustang GT. The Lightning is only 240
     hp. It's got 4.10's and more torque but they weigh a lot more than
     your Dak. The only thing I miss about not getting a Lightning is the
     amount of aftermarket parts available for 'em. Except for that,
     wouldn't give up my Dak for one if you offered it to me for free.
     
     ********************97 Dakota Sport*************************
     * *
     * sean meldrum Email: work:sean_p_meldrum@auto.ittind.com *
     * home:dakota@c3net.net *
     * *
     * Black, reg. cab, 2wd, 318, 5spd, 3.55 SG, FIPK clone, *
     * MSD 6A and Blaster coil awaiting installation. *
     * *
     ************************************************************
     

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________

On my lunch break today, I pulled up at a light next to a Ford Lightning
(351 powered F-150). When the light went green, I took off fairly easy
because I didn't know if the guy wanted to race or not. I didn't even have
the Dak floored in first gear. He punched the Ford and so I opened it up in
2nd and 3rd gears - we got up to about 75 mph or so and we were side by side
the entire way. If I had launched hard I'm sure I could've beaten him. Or
if I had an SBEC - fat chance with a 1996 though.
     
Kowalski - 96 short-bed 318 5-speed 3.90 gears, cat-back flowmaster duals.
     
     
     
---------------------------------------------
kowalski@mnsinc.com
http://www.mnsinc.com/kowalski
1970 Superbird 440+6 | 1970 Charger R/T 440+6
1976 Feather Duster | 1996 Dakota 318 Magnum
---------------------------------------------
     
     

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:39 EDT