Yup! I believe it was in "On Her Majesty's Secret Service", with George Lazenby. I'd have to watch them all again to confirm. BTW, I do have 'every' James Bond movie made, including the ones some purists believe not to be true JB movies.
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Seagondollar [SMTP:segndolr@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 1997 3:03 PM
To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
Subject: Re: Superchargers. Was: Re: More latenight cruisin'
Prologue: Account Representative - Network Hardware
Epilogue: Life is (at the very least)
a third order differential equation,
expressed in four dimensions.
DisplaySubject: Re: Superchargers. Was: Re: More latenight cruisin'
Does anyone remember early James Bond's original blower Bentley (a short
chassis, I beleive), wherein he pulls a knob to activate the supercharger?
To: dakota @ ait.fredonia.edu @ internet
cc:
From: steiger @ ait.fredonia.edu @ internet @ D04AU037 @ IBMLMS01
Date: 06-10-97 04:13:12 PM
Subject: Re: Superchargers. Was: Re: More latenight cruisin'
At 10:29 PM 6/9/97 -0400, Sean Meldrum wrote:
>>
>>>With the currently available products a roots type installation would
>>>probably still be pricey. If you were willing to switch to the older style
>>>'A' block heads you'd have a much easier time of it.
>>
>> Forgive my ignorance (there's a lot of stuff I'm still learning :),
>>but when you say heads, do you mean cylinder heads? If so, how do
>>the heads affect what type of supercharger could be installed?
>>
>Hey, never say sorry for wanting to learn sumthin' ya don't know. 8^) I
>thought I knew plenty about cars and I've learned a *ton* from this list.
:)
>
>To answer your question.....Yep, cylinder heads. The reason the heads are
>the limiting factor for a roots system on the Magnum motor is the intake
>manifold. A roots blower need a special intake to mount to. I have yet to
>see one available for the Magnum heads. You should be able to find one for
>the older 'A' block heads. A good setup could center around Edelbrock's
>new aluminum small block Mopar heads. The older head would require a few
>changes. Good bye stock roller cam, distributer change, all new valvetrain
>gear, small odds and ends.
Thanks for the info! :) Is there another supercharger methodology which
might be cheaper than a centrifugal, and easier to install than a roots?
>
>This is what's nice about the centrifugal units. Completely exterior add
>on. Bolt the sucker on like yer swappin' alternators.
Couldn't the intake to the roots be re-routed somehow to blow the
air into the same place that the centrifugal would? Or does a roots
run off the camshaft or something, as opposed to the belt? (Or is my
lack of supercharger knowledge showing through again?) ;)
>
>If you want contant power a supercharger or a turbo would be a better
>choice over nitrous. Both will take life out of your motor due to the fact
>that you're using them in more of a WOT type situation. If you did nothing
>to your motor and stood on the go pedal all the time you'd shorten it's life.
What I always thought would be cool was a turbo or supercharger that
could be turned off. A little switch in the cab would make it free-wheel,
and not generate any power. Flip the switch on, the impeller starts back
up, and you're in business! Still expensive, obviously, but you've got
the "only there when you want it"ness of nitrous, and you don't have to
keep refilling those bottles... If such a switch were a relatively cheap
add on, I'd buy one. :)
-Jon-
Jon Steiger - Network Administrator for Academic Information Technology
.- steiger@ait.fredonia.edu -- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ -.
| DoD# 1038, EAA# 518210, NMA# 117376, USUA# A46209, KotWitDoDFAQ |
| '96 Dodge Dakota SLT V8, '96 Kolb FireFly 447, '91 Yamaha FZR600R |
`---------------------------------------------------------------------'
I do not speak for SUNY College at Fredonia; any opinions are my own.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:44 EDT