Re: 3.55 vs 3.92 Thanks!

From: KARL MOLTZAN (kmoltzan@mymail.net)
Date: Wed Aug 20 1997 - 09:16:18 EDT

Next message: howard cornish: "Re: thoryley pics"
Previous message: Chris Ruggiers: "Re: thorley pics"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 3.55 vs 3.92 Thanks!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 21:43:39 -0400 (EDT) WillTier@aol.com
wrote:

>In a message dated 97-08-18 23:42:14 EDT, you write:
>
><< No other changes at that time
>
> 92 CC 4X2 5.2L 4/5RT(stock cam)
> 1.7Crower, Electric Fans
> DTs,Jacobs Omnipac
> B&M Shifter 4200lbs
> 15.054@90.124
> kmoltzan@mymail.net
>
> >>
>
>How about more spin do to more power off the line ?
>
>Bill
>
Hoosier Quick times 295/60 get great traction.

                92 CC 4X2 5.2L 4/5RT(stock cam)
                   1.7Crower, Electric Fans
                     DTs,Jacobs Omnipac
                     B&M Shifter 4200lbs
                       15.054@90.124
                     kmoltzan@mymail.net

Next message: howard cornish: "Re: thoryley pics"
Previous message: Chris Ruggiers: "Re: thorley pics"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: 3.55 vs 3.92 Thanks!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:50 EDT