Suggestion: If everyone puts their message at the TOP of the preceding
messages, it'll make it much easier/quick to read all the new messages
every day. Comprende?
----------
> From: Jarrod Pilone <moparman@jet.laker.net>
> To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: Drag Radials; was Big Meats
> Date: Wednesday, August 20, 1997 10:22 PM
>
> the 2.08 60' time was a typo. it dropped to 2.308 from 2.44:)
>
> Jarrod
>
>
> Jarrod Pilone moparman@laker.net
> http://falcon.laker.net/moparman
> '97 Dakota CC Sport V8, Flowmaster, FIPK, Pilone Throttle Body, Transgo
> Shift Kit.
> '72 Dodge Demon, future 12 second 1/4 mile car
>
>
>
> ----------
> > From: Andre Mauboussin <andrem@cyberramp.net>
> > To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> > Subject: Re: Drag Radials; was Big Meats
> > Date: Thursday, August 21, 1997 8:25 PM
> >
> > WillTier@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 97-08-20 23:46:32 EDT, you write:
> > >
> > > << my 60ft times have improved all across the board from 2.44
> > > to 2.08 with the mods and the drag radials >>
> > >
> > > Nice 60' time, seems though that should have come right off your et ?
> > > .36
> > > improvement should have bump you into the 15's ? Doesn't make much
> > > sense but
> > > I've had similar situations, do something that has to get you .5 and
> > > ya end
> > > up with a .05 or nothing at all. I've been pretty patient since and
> > > been
> > > doing a lot of research. I am working on a plan for the winter but
> > > with my
> > > brainstorms it will probably run .5 slower. Hey good luck with
> > > figuring it
> > > out.
> > >
> > > Bill
> >
> > My best 60' time is 2.11 and I run 14.70@92.5mph! Hmmmmmmm
> >
> > Andre
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:50 EDT