I see in 1994 they drop 10hp and gain 10ft lbs
What was the main cause for the lose of the 10hp?
Glenn.
----------
> From: Michael Clark <mclark@wt.net>
> To: dakota@ait.fredonia.edu
> Subject: Re: Horse power ratings
> Date: Saturday, September 06, 1997 4:53 PM
>
> vanderbu@silk.net wrote:
> >
> > Would someone please advise me what the stock
> >
> > dakota V-8 horse power ratings are per year
>
> I'll take a crack at it....
> >
> > 1990= Don't know (pre-magnum I would GUESS 175hp???)
> >
> > 1991= Don't know (Some late '91 models were magnums so those were
230hp/285ft.lbs)
> >
> > 1992= 230hp/285ft.lbs
> >
> > 1993=230hp/285ft.lbs
> >
> > 1994=220hp/295ft.lbs
> >
> > 1995=220hp/295ft.lbs
> >
> > 1996=220hp/295ft.lbs
> >
> > 1997=230hp/295ft.lbs
> >
> > 1998= See 1997 ;~)
> >
>
> Does anyone know how the '97's got back the extra 10hp without loosing
> the torque?
> --
> Michael Clark mike@snakebite.com
> '93 Mark III 4X2 V-8 SWB RC auto
> MP SBEC, K&N FIPK, Flowmaster cat-back dual
> Doug Thorley Headers
> http://userv.wt.net/~mclark/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:52 EDT