Re: dakota HP ratings

From: Phil Hyde (philh@insync.net)
Date: Mon Sep 08 1997 - 13:27:19 EDT


E. Frank Ball III wrote:
>
> } I see in 1994 they drop 10hp and gain 10ft lbs
> } What was the main cause for the lose of the 10hp?
> } Glenn.
>
> They reduced the diameter of the crossover pipes and the catalytic
> converter. The pre-'94s used a 3" pipe and converter, then reduced to
> 2.5" after the converter. '94 to '96 used the smaller Y-pipe and 2.5"
> all the way back from there. I'd like to know what sizing the '97s
> have.

Didn't they also use a different cam in '92-93? I've often heard
that the "magnum" cam from those years is supposed to be better.

just my $.02,
Phil
'97 Dak



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:52 EDT