Re: Truckin' magazine

From: kmiller (kmiller@cvn.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 1997 - 18:27:20 EDT


Another reason is "looks" I personally like a truck that sits low. Not
slammed down so far you have to put hydraulics on it but a nice looking
ride. Again, it is all in what you like.

Later

Scott miller

----------
> From: Braxton, John <jbraxton@gmgw.com>
> To: DAKOTA <DAKOTA-TRUCK@buffnet.net>
> Subject: RE: DML: Truckin' magazine
> Date: Monday, October 20, 1997 5:21 PM
>
> ----------
> From: DAVID A DI SANTI
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Truckin' magazine
> Date: Sunday, October 19, 1997 6:00PM
>
> <Hello all,
>
> <I purchased the magazine, I was impressed with the articles and Pixs.
> <I have a question. Why were most of the trucks Daks and others
> <lowered? I think that that ruins the aesthetics of a truck. I like
> <the big tires and wheels look. Is there a functional reason to lower
> <a truck?
>
> Dave
> One functional reason would be less air can get under the truck making
> it more aerodynamic. Also easily loaded because of the high of bed.
>
> John
> 89 shelby dakota



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:55 EDT