What are you talking about? What Mustangs have you "wamped"? You must
have either raced a V6 'Stang or the other guy wasn't really racing you.
Sure, the Dak is a fast truck, but it can't hang with a 5.0 or 4.6 liter
Mustang.
Andy
At 04:36 AM 11/27/97 -0800, you wrote:
> I totally agree with the ratio portion, when you wamp a mustang thy
>almost cry in disbelief, DAK 97 2WD SLT+ CC 318V8 3.90 AUTO is in the
>front/ stock/better tires. Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> Rob Agnew [SMTP:ragnew@islandnet.com]
> Wednesday, November 26, 1997 9:46 AM
> dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Re: DML: Re: Dakota puchase questions
>
>At 10:55 AM 11/26/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>Sorry, one more question. Rear axle ratio? I understand the performance
>>pros and cons of 3.21 vs 3.55 vs 3.90. In an effort to keep gas mileage
>>up, I was considering going for a lower numerical raito (3.21).
>
> I have 3.55 and
>it's good for towing,
>yet has good fuel economy and lots of giddyup.
>
>
>
>Rob Agnew
>ragnew@islandnet.com
>
>Victoria, B.C.
>Canada
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Andy Callahan University of Kentucky quasideedle@uky.campus.mci.net
'97, black/mist gray, 4x2, Sport, club cab, V8, 3.55 SG, 5-speed, Tire &
Handling Package, all the little goodies
Mods: Firestone Firehawk SS10 275/60/15's, GT Classic steel tonneau
cover, "Super Sucker" FIPK by Air Meldrum, CC bed mat
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:07:58 EDT