RE: Re: Re:fast neons

From: Craig Baltzer (cbaltzer@Anjura.COM)
Date: Sat Feb 21 1998 - 01:11:52 EST


Take a deep breath Robert. Key word in my post: "CAR". I think Chrysler
is doing fine with the trucks, but their cars are not competitive in
terms of power with the other manufacturers "performance sedan" models

Chev, Ford and the imports all have a number of "sedans" that will turn
6-8 second 0-60 times; Chrysler has nothing, nada, squat. A Chrysler
equiv. of a Contour SVT - Nope. Taurus SHO - Nope. Caddy STS - Nope.
Nissan Maxima - Nope. Olds Intrigue - Nope. Grand Prix GTP - Nope.
Hardly looks "covered" to me...

As far as the Neon goes, its a good little car, but hardly "exceptional"
in the class. Chev is right there in terms of HP and performance with
the Z24 Cavalier, as are the imports from Honda, Nissan and Mazda.

Oh yea, while I have my soapbox out: As far as "winning" all of the SCCA
races, I have two words: Contingency Money. Chrysler plowed so much
money into contingency $$s for the various solo and racing series that
you'd almost be a fool not to run a Neon. When you have 90-95% of some
classes running Neons, the odds of a win are pretty good. I'm quite
familiar with solo II, and with a Neon ACR you could actually make money
running the series off of the Chrysler contingency $$$s. They were also
"discounting" the car if you promised to run it at the SCCA or CASC
(Canadian equiv of SCCA) regional level. I know a fair number of people
that bought them just for that reason; if other manufacturers had
matching $$$s, they wouldn't have been driving Neons...

Craig

P.S. One final thought: Its pretty sad when your mini-van is within 0.3
seconds 0-60 of your "touring car" convertible (Sebring).

____________________________________________

Craig Baltzer - Anjura Technology Corp - Ottawa, Ontario
Craig.Baltzer@anjura.com - (613) 727-1411
_____________________________________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Trottmann [SMTP:rotrottmann@davidson.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 1998 1:35 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re:fast neons
>
> Mediocre? Find another truck that can haul more than 500 pounds
> that's as
> fast as the Dak w/ a 318. Oh yeah, forgot about that 360, too. What
> would
> you like to compare the neon to in terms of speed? Escort? Metro?
> True,
> there is nothing between the viper and the neon, no answer to the
> Camero
> offered, but other than that, they've got the competiton covered.
> Corvette
> vs. Viper, yeah, right. Dakota vs. S10? Please.
>
> Craig Baltzer wrote:
>
> > Kind of sad to think that Chrysler's cars are all such mediocre
> > performers. If all you have in the car lineup that can better 8
> seconds
> > 0-60 is the Viper (boy talk about killing the fly with a
> sledgehammer)
> > and the Neon, guess you're not much of a "performance" car company
> (and
> > no the Prowler can't muster a sub-8 second 0-60 time). The "really"
> sad
> > thing is that most of the cars (even with the optional V6's are in
> the
> > 9.0 second range. Oh well...
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > ____________________________________________
> >
> > Craig Baltzer - Anjura Technology Corp - Ottawa, Ontario
> > Craig.Baltzer@anjura.com - (613) 727-1411
> > _____________________________________________
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: WM96@AOL.COM [SMTP:WM96@AOL.COM]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 20, 1998 6:12 PM
> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > > Subject: Re: Re: DML: Re: Re:fast neons
> > >
> > > >>
> > >
> > > I guess I forgot to put in one part (oops.) From what I heard it
> was
> > > the
> > >
> > > fastest production CAR on chrysler's lineup since the viper. No
> doubt
> > > a
> > >
> > > camaro or one of those others could blow it away. I was just
> thinking
> > > that
> > >
> > > maybe since the Avengers have the V6 and all, maybe they would be
> some
> > >
> > > competition, but evidently not.
> > >
> > > >>
> > > I looked at Avengers before I bought my Dak becuase I thought they
> > > looked
> > > kinda different andyou don't see em everyday, but the performance
> just
> > > isn't
> > > there for them. It was pretty dissapointing.
> > >
> > > Will
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:14 EDT