Re: Re: Transmission Prob/ 96 Dak was WEAK TRANNY

From: david zavetsky (zavetsky@usaor.net)
Date: Sun Mar 01 1998 - 07:55:27 EST


YES
59k & 89k +/-
B

At 07:54 PM 2/27/98 -0500, you wrote:
>At the risk of perpetuating this thread into the new millenium, here's a
>short questionnaire for those with auto trannys:
>
>1) Problems? yes/no
>2) Miles? _____________
>3) I drive like: a) Aunt Bea (From the Andy Griffith Show, for
>those under 40)
> b) The Iraqi Army fleeing Kuwait
>
>Add one letter grade for honesty. ;-)
>
>gk
>________________________________________________________________________
>Gary E. Klim - Somewhere in central Connecticut garyklim@snet.net
>http://pages.cthome.net/garyklim/ gklim@harman.com
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joe Borg <joe.borg@ccmail.dowjones.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Friday, February 27, 1998 9:42 AM
>Subject: DML: Transmission Prob/ 96 Dak was WEAK TRANNY
>
>
>> After my recent posts concerning info I gathered on DAKS "WEAK"
>> transmissions I recieved a barrage of mail stating my info was wrong.
>> I also recieved an equal OR greater amount of mail from people who
>> have are experiencing all kinds of chronic problems, mostly with the
>> OD unit. Comments?? Joe
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:20 EDT