Re: Re: DML Digest V3 #633

From: Gary E. Klim (garyklim@snet.net)
Date: Tue Mar 24 1998 - 21:01:33 EST


The answer to the "Bumper Question" would appear to be spelled SLT. (Let's hope the quality of the chrome is better than
the paint...)

gk

98 SLT 4x4 5.2 etc.
________________________________________________________________________
Gary E. Klim - Somewhere in central Connecticut garyklim@snet.net
http://pages.cthome.net/garyklim/ gklim@harman.com
________________________________________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: CBAGDAD <CBAGDAD@AOL.COM>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 1998 8:50 PM
Subject: DML: Re: DML Digest V3 #633

>More to the "Rusty Bumper" file. I have a 97 sport+, and live in New England,
>I thought it was due to the salt and whatnot. When I showed the Service Mnger
>at the dealer, he said they would paint it or replace it, but he wanted the
>chrysler rep to see it. So I showed him when he was in the area and he said
>replace it. NO problem what so ever, except it was the clear coat on the
>bumper that peeled, and the new bumper is dull(minus the clear coat), all the
>98's on the lot have the bumpers with no clear coat! So now I'm trying to get
>my rear bumper to peel the same way so I can get a match. By the way, my
>original bumper was like a semi-gloss, in case you didnt know.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:30 EDT