Re: Dakota 4X4 -Reply

From: Michael Z-Sykes (MSykes@su.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 06 1998 - 09:31:21 EDT


Amen, Trottmann!!
mike
88\ /|_ LE3.55
     \/ |_|

>>> Robert Trottmann <rotrottmann@davidson.edu> 04/03/98 07:16pm
>>>
On May 10th, I'm going home from college, from NC to St. Louis. I'll be
able to
fit everything I brought with me in my truck. Try that with a mustang, and
yet
I'll win at a stoplight, too. I think of my truck as a functional mustang.
Fast
and useful. Yes, my truck is lowered 2" in the rear, but I take the old
gravel
roads near Davidson faster than the punk with the 4X4 F150. Honestly, I
think my
truck is everything I want in a vehicle. Why don't I have a 4X4? Let me
show you
my taillights, and I'll see you, as I pass the gas station.
Sorry, I just catch a lot of sh[t like your post from the little bastards at
Davidson, who think that my truck with it's 2" drop is a "lowrider."
Robert

Pytho212 wrote:

> What is the reasoning behind buying a 2wd truck? If you want to race
get a
> mustang or vette. Trucks are used for there 4X4 ability. Does anyone
on this
> list use their truck in the outdoors? I'm certainly not nocking the 2wd
> dakota. I would love to get a R/T. Just wondering. Getting my new
truck
> soooooon.

--
Mailto:rotrottmann@davidson.edu
http://thelma.davidson.edu/rotrottmann/web/default.htm
Davidson, NC- Now
St. Louis, MO- May 19th
95 Sport 318 Auto 2WD



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:35 EDT