At 09:11 AM 4/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>GO for the Paxton or Vortech. I will get a Vortech when they come out with
>one for the 98. It is gear driven and uses engin oil to cool and takes less
>power to drive than the paxton. Both companies have been around and have web
>pages full of info.
>Paxton has a quiter blower because it uses ball bearings but takes allot to
>drive. It also has a self lubricating system.
>They are both great products, paxton has a kit for the 97's.
>
>http://www.vortecheng.com
>http://www.paxtonproducts.com
>
>
>Joel
>
Joel,
Thanks for the information. I'm still intrigued with Kenne- Bell
twin-screw concept
of low rpm boost.Actual 1/4 times would be secondary.What I would like is
a strong
increase in torque from off idle to 3500rpms.Or I might go the
conventional route.
Mp computer... 25hp
Headers....... 15hp
K&N........... 10hp
TB mods....... 15hp
pulleys....... 5hp
P&P heads..... 20hp
cowl induction.20hp = high 13s?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Amanda
>> Sent: Monday, May 25, 1998 8:03 AM
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> Subject: RE: DML:Kenne Bell Blowers for '97- '98 Daks
>>
>>
>> At 03:47 PM 4/16/98 -0700, you wrote:
>> >Except for headers, exhaust and 1.7 Crower roller rockers and valve
>> >springs/retainers, the truck was stock. The only thing that may give a
>> >false sense of power is the fact that my truck will produce more
>> >horsepower than most Dakotas out there. It's NOT an automatic. I have a
>> >five-speed manual tranny that will not lose as much power due to
>> >parasitic loss.
>> >
>> >Lance L. Martz
>> >LanceM@mcmullenargus.com
>> >
>> > Hello Lance,
>> What is the latest on your blower project? I'm trying to decide between
>> Kenne bell s/c and the Vortech system. I have read and heard
>> many conflicting
>> reports. Any input would be appreciated.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:38 EDT