Not to mention that yours weighs less, Mike.
Older Daks rule!
Later,
Robert
Michael Clark wrote:
> catlin wrote:
> > The R/T Dakota
> > dyno was 191.7 rear wheel horse power @ 4500 RPM.
> >
>
> Dang, back when I dynoed my itty-bitty 5.2 with the FIPK, MP SBEC, 180
> tstat, and STOCK restrictive exhaust system I made 211 at the rear
> wheels. I would have expected the R/T numbers to be a bit higher than
> that, seeing as how it does have 42 more cubic inches... What was the
> torque on it, that's probably where the R/T will shine.
> --
> ---Mike, near Houston.---
> My sig file=====> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/signature.txt
> My Dakota page==> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/dakota.html
> Dakota Webring==> http://web.wt.net/~mclark/webring/ring.html
-- Mailto:rotrottmann@davidson.edu http://thelma.davidson.edu/rotrottmann/web/default.htm Davidson, NC- Now St. Louis, MO- May 19th 95 Sport 318 Auto 2WD
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:08:45 EDT